U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1989

United States v. Quincy Penn Harris

United States v. Quincy Penn Harris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided December 13, 1989
891 F.2d 293; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18928; 1989 WL 150519 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Quincy Penn Harris

Opinion

891 F.2d 293

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Quincy Penn HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-1474.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1989.

Before MILBURN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges, ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.