Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1989

Reginald Whigham v. Dale Foltz

Reginald Whigham v. Dale Foltz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 19, 1989
892 F.2d 80; 1989 WL 153471 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Reginald Whigham v. Dale Foltz

Opinion

892 F.2d 80

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Reginald WHIGHAM, Petitioner-Appellant
v.
Dale FOLTZ, Respondent-Appellee

No. 88-1672.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1989.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

We have received today an order from the Supreme Court vacating our order and remanding to our court.

2

Pursuant to that order, the judgment of the district court is hereby vacated. The request for in forma pauperis status is granted, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Harris v. Reed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑