Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1991

Mark Lanning v. Sears, Roebuck and Company Steven G. Freers

Mark Lanning v. Sears, Roebuck and Company Steven G. Freers
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided March 15, 1991
928 F.2d 404; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 8533; 1991 WL 34631 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Mark Lanning v. Sears, Roebuck and Company Steven G. Freers

Opinion

928 F.2d 404

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Mark LANNING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY; Steven G. Freers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-1558.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 15, 1991.

E.D.Mich., 89-72903, Duggan, J.

E.D.Mich.

AFFIRMED.

Before KEITH and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges; BAILEY BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑