U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1991

United States v. Jack Siklich

United States v. Jack Siklich
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 26, 1991
945 F.2d 405; 1991 WL 190123 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Jack Siklich

Opinion

945 F.2d 405

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Jack SIKLICH, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-1498.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 26, 1991.

Before KENNEDY and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.