Nurse Midwifery Associates v. Hibbett
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Plaintiffs, in their petition for rehearing, ask this court to issue a supplemental opinion addressing the disposition on appeal of their claim of conspiracy between State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company and B.K. Hibbett, M.D.
In order that there be no confusion in this regard, the final paragraph of our opinion, which was filed on November 6, 1990, 918 F.2d 605, is modified to read as follows:
“For the reasons stated, we reverse the grant of summary judgment to defendants SVMIC and Dr. Hibbett to the extent that it disposed of plaintiffs’ claim that Dr. Hib-bett and other principals at SVMIC conspired in violation of the Act, and remand that claim pursuant to Section III(B) of this opinion. We also reverse the district court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of Drs. Melkin, Baer, and Andrews. In all other respects, the deci
To the extent set out above, the petition for rehearing is granted.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- NURSE MIDWIFERY ASSOCIATES Susan Sizemore Victoria Henderson Darrell Martin, M.D. Richard and Margaret Carpenter, (88-5842), (88-5491) v. B.K. HIBBETT, M.D. E. Conrad Shackleford, M.D. George Andrews, M.D. Stephen Melkin, M.D. Harry Baer, M.D. State Volunteer Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. and Vanderbilt University Hospital, (88-5842), Southern Hills Hospital and Hendersonville Community Hospital, (88-5491)
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published