U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1992

United States v. Harold Ross

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided May 11, 1992

961 F.2d 1580; 1992 WL 98029 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

961 F.2d 1580

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Harold ROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-3996.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 11, 1992.

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES and ALAN E NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and WOODS, District Judge.*

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

The Honorable George E. Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.