U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1992

United States v. Arthur Acosta

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided August 18, 1992

972 F.2d 349; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 26179; 1992 WL 198545 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

972 F.2d 349

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Arthur ACOSTA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 91-2056.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 1992.

Before MERRITT, Chief Judge, and MILBURN and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.