U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1993

United States v. William J. Meyer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided July 9, 1993

999 F.2d 541; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26240; 1993 WL 261997 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

999 F.2d 541

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William J. MEYER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6019.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 9, 1993.

Before RYAN and BOGGS, Circuit Judges and ECHOLS, District Judge.*

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

The Honorable Robert L Echols, District Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting be designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.