U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1993

United States v. Stanley Pickens

United States v. Stanley Pickens
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 7, 1993
7 F.3d 236; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 33269; 1993 WL 340066 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Stanley Pickens

Opinion

7 F.3d 236

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stanley PICKENS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-2306.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 7, 1993.

Before KEITH, GUY and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

2

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.