U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1993

United States v. Stacey Randall Huddleston

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided December 15, 1993

12 F.3d 215; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 36696; 1993 WL 524248 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

12 F.3d 215

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Stacey Randall HUDDLESTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-1472.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1993.

Before: BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges; CELEBREZZE, Senior Judge.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.