Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1994

Fannie Armstrong, James L. Gray v. Sara Lee Corporation

Fannie Armstrong, James L. Gray v. Sara Lee Corporation
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided May 3, 1994
23 F.3d 406; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17570; 1994 WL 168516 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Fannie Armstrong, James L. Gray v. Sara Lee Corporation

Opinion

23 F.3d 406
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Fannie ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff-Appellant,
James L. Gray, Plaintiff,
v.
SARA LEE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 93-5496.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 3, 1994.

1

Before: GUY and NELSON, Circuit Judges; QUIST, District Judge.*

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, District Court Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑