U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1994

United States v. Malcom David Young

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided November 22, 1994

41 F.3d 1509; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38865; 1994 WL 659291 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

41 F.3d 1509

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Malcom David YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-5149.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 22, 1994.

Before: RYAN, BATCHELDER and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.