U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1994

Aiken v. City of Memphis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided February 3, 1994 · Batchelder, Boggs, Guy, Jones, Keith, Kennedy, Martin, Merritt, Milburn, Nelson, Norris, Ryan, Siler, Suhrheinrich

9 F.3d 461; 1993 WL 454215 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Grant v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville (District Court, M.D. Tennessee 2010)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.