Nixon v. Kent County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit November 21, 1994

Nixon v. Kent County, 34 F.3d 369 (6th Cir. 1994)

1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33077; 1994 WL 487314

Batchelder, Boggs, Daughtrey, Guy, Jones, Keith, Kennedy, Martin, Merritt, Milburn, Nelson, Norris, Ryan, Siler, Suhrheinrich

Opinion of the Court

*384ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this ease is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Reference

Full Case Name: Debra NIXON, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. KENT COUNTY, of MICHIGAN, Kent County Apportionment Commission
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published