U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Ervin Williams

United States v. Ervin Williams
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 22, 1995
66 F.3d 327 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Ervin Williams

Opinion

66 F.3d 327

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ervin WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 95-5057, 95-5095, 95-5096.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Sept. 22, 1995.

1

Before: MILBURN, NELSON, Circuit Judges, MORTON, District Judge.*

ORDER

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

The Honorable L. Clure Morton, District Court Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.