U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Cordova Chemical Co. Of Michigan, Cpc International, Inc., Arnold C. Ott, Michigan Dept. Of Natural Resources

United States v. Cordova Chemical Co. Of Michigan, Cpc International, Inc., Arnold C. Ott, Michigan Dept. Of Natural Resources
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 19, 1995
67 F.3d 586; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29702 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Cordova Chemical Co. Of Michigan, Cpc International, Inc., Arnold C. Ott, Michigan Dept. Of Natural Resources

Opinion

67 F.3d 586

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CORDOVA CHEMICAL CO. OF MICHIGAN, et al., Defendants-Appellants,
CPC International, Inc., Defendant-Appellee,
Arnold C. Ott, et al., Defendants,
Michigan Dept. of Natural Resources, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 92-2288/2326.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1995.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KENNEDY, MARTIN, MILBURN, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 59 F.3d 584

ORDER

1

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

2

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

4

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.