U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1995

United States of America v. Jack Martin Penick

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided October 19, 1995

68 F.3d 475; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 38002; 1995 WL 620963 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

68 F.3d 475

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Jack Martin PENICK, Defendant - Appellant

No. 95-3106.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Oct. 19, 1995.

Before: MERRITT, Chief Circuit Judge; KENNEDY, Circuit Judge; JOINER*, Senior U.S. District Judge.

ORDER

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

The Honorable Charles W. Joiner, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.