U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1996

United States v. James Erwin, Jr.

United States v. James Erwin, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided March 6, 1996 · Merritt, Kennedy, Martin, Milburn, Nelson, Ryan, Boggs, Norris, Suhrheinrich, Siler, Batchelder, Daughtrey, Moore, Cole
78 F.3d 232; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3986; 1996 WL 111573 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. James Erwin, Jr.

Opinion

*233 ORDER

Prior report: 71 F.3d 218.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en bane shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.