United States v. Michael Deon Smith
United States v. Michael Deon Smith
Opinion
85 F.3d 630
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Deon SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-5798.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 8, 1996.
Before: SILER and BATCHELDER, and Circuit Judges; and CARR,* District Judge.
ORDER
This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,
The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.
The Honorable James G. Carr, U.S. District Court Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.