U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1996

United States v. James Cortez Ivy, Also Known as Dave Dennis

United States v. James Cortez Ivy, Also Known as Dave Dennis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided June 7, 1996
89 F.3d 836; 1996 WL 308841 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. James Cortez Ivy, Also Known as Dave Dennis

Opinion

89 F.3d 836

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Cortez IVY, also known as Dave Dennis, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-2110.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 7, 1996.

1

Before: MERRITT and COLE, Circuit Judges; ECHOLS, District Judge*.

ORDER

2

This cause having come on to be heard upon the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties, and upon due consideration thereof,

3

The court finds that no prejudicial error intervened in the judgment and proceedings in the district court, and it is therefore ORDERED that said judgment be and it hereby is affirmed.

*

The Honorable Robert L. Echols, U.S. District Judge for for Middle District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.