U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2000

Moore v. City of Harriman

Moore v. City of Harriman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided September 12, 2000 · Batchelder, Boggs, Clay, Cole, Daughtrey, Gilman, Martin, Merritt, Moore, Norris, Siler, Suhrheinrich
218 F.3d 555; 2000 WL 1367602 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Moore v. City of Harriman

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

β€œThe effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

*556It is FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Tuesday, October 10, 2000 and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Tuesday, November 7, 2000.

The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.