Robards v. Thoms
Robards v. Thoms
Opinion of the Court
Upon consideration, we conclude that the district court is in a better position to resolve the impact of the Lopez decision upon this case than we are. See Hardy v. Sec’y for Dep’t of Corrs., 246 F.3d 1300, 1301 (11th Cir. 2001) (per curiam). Therefore, it is sua sponte ordered that the judgment of the district court is vacated, and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Lopez. The motion for the appointment of counsel is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.