Marchwinski v. Howard

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit January 21, 2003

Marchwinski v. Howard, 319 F.3d 258 (6th Cir. 2003)

2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 933

Opinion

Tanya L. MARCHWINSKI, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Douglas E. HOWARD, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Family Independence Agency of Michigan, A Governmental Department of the State of Michigan, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-2115.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 21, 2003.

Before: MARTIN, Chief Judge; BOGGS, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant and appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, February 17, 2003.

Reference

Full Case Name: Tanya L. Marchwinski v. Douglas E. Howard, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Family Independence Agency of Michigan, a Governmental Department of the State of Michigan
Status: Published