United States v. Elve

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
United States v. Elve, 115 F. App'x 310 (6th Cir. 2004)

United States v. Elve

Opinion

FARRIS, Circuit Judge.

We understand but reject Elve’s argument that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence by two levels for more than minimal planning. An enhancement for more than minimal planning is warranted if a defendant takes significant affirmative steps to conceal his offense. Here, Elve provided false information on his loan application and thereby concealed that he had illegally obtained the HUD-owned property. He also provided his bank with a false warranty deed, which incorrectly showed that he had purchased the property for $70,000. The district court did not commit clear error in concluding that Elve took significant steps to avoid detection of his crime.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Chad M. ELVE, Defendant-Appellant
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Unpublished