U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2004

Kaye v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

Kaye v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 14, 2004
95 F. App'x 151

Kaye v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, Armene Kaye, appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. Plaintiff contends that defendant, Daimler-Chrysler Corporation, violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Michigan’s Elliot-Larsen Civil Rights Act by discriminating against her on the basis of *152her gender and retaliating against plaintiff for complaining to her supervisor by inappropriately transferring plaintiff to a previous job position.

After reviewing the briefs and the record in this case, we believe that the District Court’s comprehensive and thorough opinion adequately addresses all of the issues plaintiff raises on appeal. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court’s grant of summary judgment based on the reasoning in the District Court’s opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.