U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2005

Brock v. Potter

Brock v. Potter
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided August 22, 2005 · Batchelder, Griffin, Gadola
140 F. App'x 618

Brock v. Potter

Opinion

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Jean Gilchrist Brock appeals from the magistrate judge’s final order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Clement Dale Potter and the State of Tennessee on Brock’s claims of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., violation of her constitutional right to intimate association pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and unlawful discharge in violation of the Tennessee Human Rights Act, T.C.A. § 4-21-101 et seq. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable law, the parties’ briefs and counsels’ arguments, we are convinced that the magistrate judge’s order contains no reversible error either in its determination that no genuine issues of material fact remain for trial or in its conclusions of law. Because the issuance of a full written opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and would be duplicative, we AFFIRM the grant of summary judgment on the basis of the magistrate judge’s well-reasoned opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.