U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2006

United States v. Ramierz-Chavez

United States v. Ramierz-Chavez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided June 14, 2006 · Ryan, Cole, Sargus
184 F. App'x 532

United States v. Ramierz-Chavez

Opinion

SARGUS, District Judge.

Appellant Gilberto Ramirez-Chavez contends, and the government does not dispute, that he was sentenced prior to the decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), in violation of the Sixth Amendment. The parties agree that a remand is appropriate for resentencing under Booker.

The sentence is VACATED and this case is remanded for resentencing in light of Booker. 1

1

. Appellant’s counsel stated during a telephonic oral argument that Ramirez-Chavez was withdrawing his first assignment of error which challenged a sixteen-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). Consequently, the Court does not address this issue.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.