Coleman-Bey v. Dove
Coleman-Bey v. Dove
Opinion
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 06a0543n.06 Filed: August 1, 2006 No. 05-5669 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
MONROE L. COLEMAN-BEY, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE Plaintiff-Appellant, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT ) COURT FOR THE EASTERN v. ) DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY ) DAN DOVE, et al., ) OPINION ) Defendants-Appellees. )
BEFORE: DAUGHTERY and COOK, Circuit Judges; COLLIER, District Judge.* PER CURIAM. Monroe Coleman-Bey, acting pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. After reviewing the record, Mr. Coleman-Bey’s brief, and the applicable law, we conclude no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court upon the reasoning set out by that court in its order and opinion entered on March 24, 2005.
* The Honorable Curtis L. Collier, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.