Chester Kidd appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Airborne Express. Having reviewed the record and the applicable law, and having the benefit of oral argument and the parties’ briefs, we determine that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirm the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion. We will not consider Kidd’s argument, raised for the first time on appeal, that the test announced in Christian v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 252 F.3d 862 (6th Cir. 2001), governs his case.