Sunseri v. Proctor
Opinion
In order to enforce a prior judgment against general partnership Macro Cellular Partners (“Macro”), plaintiffs Jack Sunseri and Consolidated Partners, Ltd. *931 (collectively, “Sunseri”), seek to reach the individual assets of defendant partners (collectively, the “Proctors”) unnamed in the original suit. The district court granted summary judgment for the Proctors, concluding that Sunseri’s claims against the Proctors accrued with the claims against the partnership and the relevant statutes of limitations now barred the action. Review of the briefs and record counsels us to agree with the district court. Because a separate opinion would add little to the district court’s analysis, we affirm the court’s judgment, adopting its reasoning.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jack SUNSERI; Consolidated Partners, Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Phyllis PROCTOR; Conrad Proctor; David Proctor; Conrad A. Proctor Family Trust; Phyllis Proctor Family Trust; Anderson-Proctor Trust; Phyllis D. Proctor Trust; Anderson-Proctor Family Limited Partnership; Proctor, LLC; Anderson-Proctor, LLC, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished