U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2009

Leonard Strickland v. Patricia Caruso

Leonard Strickland v. Patricia Caruso
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided July 8, 2009 · Forester, McKEAGUE, Moore
328 F. App'x 330

Leonard Strickland v. Patricia Caruso

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORESTER, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant, Leonard Arthur Strickland, a pro se Michigan prisoner, appeals a district court order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil rights suit filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district judge here dismissed the complaint sua sponte for failure to state a claim, without service to the defendant. In light of this court’s recent decision in Jones v. Caruso, 569 F.3d 258 (6th Cir. 2009), this disposition is not proper. Therefore, we VACATE the judgment and REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision in Jones.

Concurring Opinion

McKEAGUE, J.,

concurring.

I agree that Jones v. Caruso, 569 F.3d 258 (6th Cir. 2009), requires us to remand for further proceedings. For the reasons set out in my dissent from that opinion, however, I remain convinced that the Jones majority opinion erred in its analysis of the Michigan Department of Correction’s regulation of Uniform Commercial Code materials.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.