U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2014

United States v. Christopher Mateen

United States v. Christopher Mateen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided April 9, 2014

United States v. Christopher Mateen

Opinion

No. 12—4481 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Apr 09, 2014 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ) Plaintiff-Appellant,

V. ORDER CHRISTOPHER J. MATEEN, Defendant—Appellee. vvvvvvvvv BEFORE: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; BOGGS, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GIBBONS, ROGERS, SUTTON, COOK McKEAGUE, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, WHITE, STRANCH, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.

A majority of the Judges of this Court In regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: “The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Wm Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.