Alicia Williams v. Steak 'N Shake, Inc.
Opinion
This is an appeal in which the appellant does not purport to identify any error by the district court. Alicia Williams worked for Steak ‘N Shake for almost seven years. Eventually they fired her. She brought this lawsuit pro se, asserting claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112, and state law. The district court granted summary judgment to Steak ‘N Shake on all of *308 Williams’s claims because she had no evidence to support them. Now represented by counsel on appeal, Williams does not identify any specific error by the district court or even describe the actual proceedings below. Instead her brief to this court is a meditation upon the putative injuries that court rules and procedures inflict upon pro se litigants. Williams therefore provides us with no lawful basis upon which to grant her relief.
The district court’s judgment is affirmed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Alicia WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STEAK ‘N SHAKE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished