George v. Hoffner
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Baker v. Ohio Operating Eng'rs Pension Plan (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2018)
- Dotson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (District Court, E.D. Kentucky 2024)
- Williamson v. Lunar (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 2023)
- Bulas v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2022)
- Winders v. Standard Insurance Company (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2022)
- Ruhe v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 2020)
- Trump v. Anthem Life Insurance Company (District Court, N.D. Ohio 2025)
- Marselle v. UNUM Insurance Company of America (District Court, W.D. Kentucky 2022)
- Tuttle v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (District Court, E.D. Michigan 2021)
- Smith v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company (District Court, E.D. Kentucky 2020)
- Lewis v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America (PLR3) (District Court, E.D. Tennessee 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Michigan state prisoner Michael George seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his jury trial convictions for first-degree murder, insurance fraud, false pretenses, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. He alleges in part that there was insufficient evidence at trial to prove that he committed the crimes. The district court denied his petition, but granted a certificate of appeala-bility on his sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim. We have evaluated this claim in light of the record, governing law, and parties’ briefs-. We find that the district court opinion on this issue expresses our view and that the issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment denying George’s § 2254 sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim for the reasons stated in that court’s July 22, 2016 order.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.