U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2017

George v. Hoffner

George v. Hoffner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided March 8, 2017 · Cook, McKeague, Merritt
682 F. App'x 381

Counsel

Peter Jon Van Hoek, State Appellate Defender Office, Detroit, MI, for Petitioner-Appellant, Andrea M. Christensen-Brown, Office of the Attorney General of Michigan, Lansing, MI, for Respondent-Appellee

George v. Hoffner

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

COOK, Circuit Judge.

Michigan state prisoner Michael George seeks relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his jury trial convictions for first-degree murder, insurance fraud, false pretenses, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. He alleges in part that there was insufficient evidence at trial to prove that he committed the crimes. The district court denied his petition, but granted a certificate of appeala-bility on his sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim. We have evaluated this claim in light of the record, governing law, and parties’ briefs-. We find that the district court opinion on this issue expresses our view and that the issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment denying George’s § 2254 sufficiency-of-the-evidence claim for the reasons stated in that court’s July 22, 2016 order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.