Waterkeeper Alliance v. EPA
Waterkeeper Alliance v. EPA
Opinion
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 18a0100n.06
Case Nos. 15-3751, et al.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
FILED In re: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT ) Feb 28, 2018 OF DEFENSE AND UNITED STATES ) DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) AGENCY FINAL RULE: CLEAN ) WATER RULE: DEFINITION OF ) ORDER OF DISMISSAL “WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES,” ) 80 Fed. Reg. 37,054 (June 29, 2015), ) ) ) MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION, et ) al., ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF THE ) ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS; and ) UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., ) ) Respondents. )
BEFORE: KEITH, McKEAGUE and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.
These consolidated actions challenging the validity of the “Clean Water Rule,” 80 Fed. Reg. 37,054
District Litigation; and Case No. 15-3751, et al. In re: Dep’t of Defense and EPA Clean Water Rule
This court having issued its jurisdictional ruling on February 22, 2016, holding that
plaintiffs’ challenges are subject to direct review in this court, 817 F.3d 261; and
The Supreme Court having granted certiorari and having on January 22, 2018, reversed
the majority jurisdictional ruling and remanded the matter to this court with instructions to
dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Nat’l Ass’n of Mfrs. v. Dep’t of Defense, 138 S. Ct. 617 (2018);
and
The Supreme Court having issued its final judgment on February 23, 2018; now
therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this court’s order of stay dated October 9, 2015,
staying the Clean Water Rule nationwide, see 803 F.3d 804, is VACATED; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all petitioners’ challenges to the Clean Water Rule
consolidated in this action are hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
____________________________________ Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
-2-
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished