United States v. Tyren Cervenak
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- United States v. Tyren Cervenak (6th Cir. 2025)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 24a0171p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ┐ Plaintiff-Appellee, │ │ > No. 23-3466 v. │ │ │ TYREN L. CERVENAK, │ Defendant-Appellant. │ ┘ On Petition for Rehearing En Banc United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.
No. 1:22-cr-00204-1—John R. Adams, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: August 9, 2024 Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER, MURPHY, DAVIS, MATHIS, and BLOOMEKATZ, Circuit Judges. _________________ COUNSEL ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Catherine Adinaro Shusky, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. ON RESPONSE: Jason Manion, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee. _________________ ORDER _________________ A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows: A decision to grant rehearing en banc vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
No. 23-3466 United States v. Cervenak Page 2
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
____________________________________ Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.