United States v. Tyren Cervenak

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
United States v. Tyren Cervenak, 110 F.4th 1296 (6th Cir. 2024)

United States v. Tyren Cervenak

Opinion

                                  RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
                                  Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
                                         File Name: 24a0171p.06

                     UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                    FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT



  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                    ┐
                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,      │
                                                               │
                                                                >        No. 23-3466
          v.                                                   │
                                                               │
                                                               │
  TYREN L. CERVENAK,                                           │
                                   Defendant-Appellant.        │
                                                               ┘

                               On Petition for Rehearing En Banc
           United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.
                     No. 1:22-cr-00204-1—John R. Adams, District Judge.

                                Decided and Filed: August 9, 2024

           Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GIBBONS, GRIFFIN,
          KETHLEDGE, STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN,
        READLER, MURPHY, DAVIS, MATHIS, and BLOOMEKATZ, Circuit Judges.
                                  _________________

                                              COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Catherine Adinaro Shusky, OFFICE OF THE
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. ON RESPONSE: Jason
Manion, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellee.
                                        _________________

ORDER

                                        _________________

       A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc
of this case. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b) provides as follows:

       A decision to grant rehearing en banc vacates the previous opinion and judgment
       of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending
       appeal.
  No. 23-3466                          United States v. Cervenak                            Page 2


        Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated,
the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

                                                ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT




                                                ____________________________________
                                                Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk


Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published