RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION
                                 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)
                                        File Name: 24a0247p.06

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                                   FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT



                                                              ┐
PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION,
                                                              │
                                    Plaintiff-Appellant,      │
                                                              │
       v.                                                     │         No. 23-3630
                                                               >
                                                              │
OLENTANGY LOCAL SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF                      │
EDUCATION; MARK T. RAIFF, in his official capacity as         │
Superintendent of Olentangy Local School District;            │
PETER STERN, in his official capacity as Olentangy’s          │
Assistant Director of Equity and Inclusion; RANDY             │
WRIGHT, in his official capacity as Olentangy’s Chief         │
of Administrative Services; KEVIN DABERKOW, in his            │
official capacity as a member of the Olentangy Board          │
of Education; BRANDON LESTER, in his official                 │
capacity as a member of the Olentangy Board of                │
Education; KEVIN O’BRIEN, in his official capacity as         │
a member of the Olentangy Board of Education;                 │
LIBBY WALLICK, in her official capacity as a member           │
of the Olentangy Board of Education; LAKESHA WYSE,            │
in her official capacity as a member of the Olentangy         │
Board of Education,                                           │
                                Defendants-Appellees.         │
                                                              ┘

                                On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
            United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Columbus.
                    No. 2:23-cv-01595—Algenon L. Marbley, District Judge.

                              Decided and Filed: November 1, 2024

        Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE,
          STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER,
         MURPHY, DAVIS, MATHIS, BLOOMEKATZ, and RITZ, Circuit Judges.
 No. 23-3630                 Parents Defending Educ. v. Olentangy                          Page 2
                                 Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ.

                                       _________________

                                           COUNSEL

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC and REPLY: J. Michael Connolly, Cameron
T. Norris, Thomas S. Vaseliou, CONSOVOY MCCARTHY PLLC, Arlington, Virginia, for
Appellant. ON RESPONSE: Bartholomew T. Freeze, Genevieve M. Hoffman, FREUND,
FREEZE & ARNOLD, Columbus, Ohio, Jessica K. Philemond, Sandra R. McIntosh, Mitchell L.
Stith, SCOTT SCRIVEN LLP, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Joseph D. Spate,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South
Carolina, John J. Bursch, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Washington, D.C., Tyson C.
Langhofer, Mathew W. Hoffmann, ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM, Lansdowne,
Virginia, Ilya Shapiro, MANHATTAN INSTITUTE, New York, New York, Kayla A. Toney,
FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE, Washington, D.C., Adam E. Schulman, HAMILTON
LINCOLN LAW INSTITUTE, Washington, D.C., Brett R. Nolan, INSTITUTE FOR FREE
SPEECH, Washington, D.C., Talmadge Butts, FOUNDATION FOR MORAL LAW, Gallant,
Alabama, for Amici Curiae.
                                       _________________

ORDER

                                       _________________

       A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en
banc of this case. Under Sixth Circuit Rule 35(b), “[a] decision to grant rehearing en banc
vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case
on the docket as a pending appeal.”

       Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are
vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

       The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for
oral argument as soon as possible.

                                              ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT




                                              Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk