U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2024

Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLC

Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLC
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2024
123 F.4th 840 (Federal Reporter, Fourth Series)
Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLC

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b)

File Name: 24a0271p.06

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

┐ DENNIS SPEERLY; JOSEPH SIERCHIO; DARRIN

│ DEGRAND; DANIEL DRAIN; WAVERS SMITH; RICHARD

│ FREEMAN; CHRISTOPHER GILES; LOUIS RAY; RICHARD

│ SULLIVAN; JAMES NORVELL; MICHAEL BANKS; GUY

│ CLARK; MARIA BARALLARDOS; CARY SHERROW; > JASON KEVIN SINCLAIR; KIMBERLY COULSON; TROY │ No. 23-1940 COULSON; ANDRE MCQUADE; DONALD DYKSHORN; │ TAIT THOMAS; JAMES PAUL BROWNE; WILLIAM │ FREDO; JON ELLARD; RHIANNA MEYERS; RANDALL │ JACOBS; MICHAEL PONDER; PHILIP WEEKS; KATRINA │ FREDO; JIMMY FLOWERS; STEVEN BRACK; KEVIN │ WESLEY; BRIAN LLOYD; GREGORY BUTSCHA; JERRY │ CARROLL; KIMBERLY CARROLL; DOMINIC EATHERTON; │ THOMAS EDMONDSON; RICHARD FILIAGGI; ROBERT │ HIGGINS; DAVID THOMPSON; DONALD SICURA, │

Plaintiffs-Appellees, │

│ │

v. │

│ GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, │

Defendant-Appellant. │

┘ On Petition for Rehearing En Banc

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. Nos. 2:19-cv-11044; 2:19-cv-11802; 2:19-cv-11808; 2:19-cv-11875;

2:19-cv-12371—David M. Lawson, District Judge.

Decided and Filed: December 19, 2024 Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, STRANCH, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER,

MURPHY, MATHIS, BLOOMEKATZ, and RITZ, Circuit Judges.* No. 23-1940 Speerly, et al. v. General Motors, LLC Page 2

_________________

COUNSEL ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Richard C. Godfrey, R. Allan Pixton, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Chicago, Illinois, John F. Bash, QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, Austin, Texas, Renee D. Smith, Cole T. Carter, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Chicago, Illinois, Jason M. Wilcox, KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, Washington, D.C., Stephanie A. Douglas, BUSH SEYFERTH PLLC, Troy, Michigan, for Appellant. ON RESPONSE: Douglas J. McNamara, Karina Puttieva, Madelyn Petersen, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Washington, D.C., Theodore J. Leopold, COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: John M. Thomas, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Kyle M. Asher, DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC, Lansing, Michigan, Stephen A. D’Aunoy, KLEIN THOMAS LEE & FRESARD, St. Louis, Missouri, Brandon L. Boxler, KLEIN THOMAS LEE & FRESARD, Richmond, Virginia, Brian D. Schmalzbach, MCGUIREWOODS LLP, Richmond, Virginia, Wendy Liu, PUBLIC CITIZEN LITIGATION GROUP, Washington, D.C., for Amici Curiae.

_________________

ORDER _________________

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Under Sixth Circuit Rule 40(d), “[a] decision to grant rehearing en banc vacates the previous opinion and judgment of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT __________________________________ Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk

* Hon. Stephanie Dawkins Davis is recused from participation in this case.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.