NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0284n.06

Case No. 23-1640

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

FILED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Jun 09, 2025 ) KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee, ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED v. ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR ) THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF DANYELLE AMUND PHILLIPS, JR., ) MICHIGAN Defendant-Appellant. ) ) OPINION

Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; CLAY and THAPAR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Danyelle Phillips Jr. pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). In his plea agreement, Phillips reserved the right to seek

appellate review of the district court’s determination that section 922(g)(1) does not violate the

Constitution on its face. He does so now. But our court recently held that section 922(g)(1) is

facially constitutional. United States v. Williams, 113 F.4th 637, 657 (6th Cir. 2024). As Phillips

recognizes, this panel can’t overrule that decision, so we affirm.