NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 25a0411n.06 Case Nos. 24-1746/1748 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FILED Aug 27, 2025 ) MICHIGAN PAVING AND MATERIALS KELLY L. STEPHENS, Clerk COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED ) STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR v. ) THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ) MICHIGAN OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 PENSION FUND, ) ) Defendant, ) OPINION ) TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ) ENGINEERS LOCAL 324 PENSION FUND, ) Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee. )

Before: THAPAR, READLER, and BLOOMEKATZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Considering this court’s recently published decision in Ace-Saginaw Paving Co. v. Operating Engineers Local 324 Pension Fund (Nos. 24-1288/1305), we affirm the judgment of the district court. We remand for the Fund’s actuary to recalculate Michigan Paving Company’s withdrawal liability using assumptions and methods that are consistent with ERISA’s requirements, as clarified by Ace-Saginaw Paving Co.