Luther Poynter v. Aaron Bennett
Opinion
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 26a0076p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
┐ LUTHER POYNTER, by and through his guardian, Anita │ Fernandez, │ Plaintiff-Appellant, > No. 25-5188 │ │ v. │ │ AARON BENNETT, in his official capacity as Barren │ County Jailer; BARREN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, │ Defendants-Appellees. │ ┘ On Petition for Rehearing En Banc United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky at Bowling Green.
No. 1:21-cv-00162—Gregory N. Stivers, Chief District Judge.
Decided and Filed: March 11, 2026 Before: SUTTON, Chief Judge; MOORE, CLAY, GRIFFIN, KETHLEDGE, THAPAR, BUSH, LARSEN, NALBANDIAN, READLER, MURPHY, DAVIS, MATHIS, BLOOMEKATZ, RITZ, and HERMANDORFER, Circuit Judges.
_________________ COUNSEL ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC: Aaron D. Smith, John A. Sowell, ENGLISH, LUCAS, PRIEST & OWSLEY, LLP, Bowling Green, Kentucky, for Appellees. ON RESPONSE: William M. Butler, Jr., Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant.
_________________ ORDER _________________ A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service has voted for rehearing en banc of this case. Under Sixth Circuit Rule 40(d), “[a] decision to grant rehearing en banc No. 25-5188 Poynter v. Bennett et al. Page 2 vacates the previous opinion and judgment or order of the court, stays the mandate, and restores the case on the docket as a pending appeal.”
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court are vacated, the mandate is stayed, and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
___________________________________ Kelly L. Stephens, Clerk
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.