U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 1893

Farwell v. Sturges

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided January 18, 1893 · Baker, Jenkins, Woods

56 F. 782; 6 C.C.A. 118; 1893 U.S. App. LEXIS 2114

Counsel

George F. Westover and James L. High, for plaintiff in error., Henry S. Monroe, for defendant in error.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Hardman v. Montana Union Ry. Co. (9th Cir. 1897)
Rhodes v. United States Nat. Bank (7th Cir. 1895)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

In this case a jury was waived, and the court below made a special finding- of the facts. The finding is in all -respects supported by evidence, though in some particulars the testimony is conflicting. Questions of fact only are urged upon oiir consideration. It is well settled that findings of fact by the court, in cases at law:, like the verdict of a jury, cannot be re*783viewed on. appeal or wilt of error. Reed v. Stapp, 3 C. C. A. 244, 52 Fed. Rep. 641, and cases cited. The judgment below is therefore affirmed, with interest and costs, and with 2 per cent, damages.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.