We are unable to distinguish tills case from that of Leonard v. Insurance Co., 48 C. C. A. 369, 109 Fed. 286. This suit is by the same plaintiff, upon a like policy of insurance covering the same stock, *1022and for a loss growing out of the same fire. We have re-examined our ruling in the case referred t», and are content therewith. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with a direction to grant a new trial.