Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /United States /Cases /U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit /

1902

86 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit opinions from 1902.

  • Forrest v. Pittsburgh Bridge Co. May 6, 1902 No. 841 116 F. 357; 53 C.C.A. 577; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4349
  • Fraser v. Yack May 6, 1902 No. 853 116 F. 285; 53 C.C.A. 563; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4331
  • Gleason v. Duffy May 6, 1902 No. 840 116 F. 298; 54 C.C.A. 100; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4335
  • Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co. May 6, 1902 No. 830 116 F. 304; 58 L.R.A. 915; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4336
  • In re Rusch May 6, 1902 No. 769 116 F. 270; 53 C.C.A. 631; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4327
  • Wellman v. Midland Steel Co. May 6, 1902 No. 774 117 F. 825; 55 C.C.A. 47; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4473
  • Western Hardware & Mfg. Co. v. Bancroft-Charnley Steel Co. May 6, 1902 No. 822 116 F. 176; 53 C.C.A. 548; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4316
  • Williams v. Crabb May 6, 1902 No. 800 117 F. 193; 59 L.R.A. 425; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4425
  • Bragg v. Wright Mar 1, 1902 No. 832 120 F. 1018; 56 C.C.A. 679; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4696
  • Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Chamberlain Mar 1, 1902 No. 784 118 F. 716; 55 C.C.A. 236; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4563
  • City of Chicago v. Pennsylvania Co. Feb 28, 1902 No. 735 119 F. 497; 57 C.C.A. 509; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4683
  • Jones v. Vance Shoe Co. Feb 28, 1902 No. 791 115 F. 707; 53 C.C.A. 289; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4242
  • National Foundry & Pipe Works, Ltd. v. Oconto City Water Supply Co. Feb 1, 1902 No. 673 113 F. 793; 51 C.C.A. 465; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3996
  • Robinson v. Chicago City Ry. Co. Jan 29, 1902 No. 810 118 F. 438; 55 C.C.A. 254; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4549
  • Marine Ins. v. Graham & Morton Transp. Co. Jan 24, 1902 No. 690 113 F. 1020; 51 C.C.A. 686; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4037
  • Armour v. Greene County State Bank Jan 21, 1902 No. 823 112 F. 631; 50 C.C.A. 399; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3886
  • Bartholomew v. Union Paper & Bag Co. Jan 21, 1902 113 F. 289; 51 C.C.A. 250; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3960
  • Chick v. Fuller Jan 21, 1902 No. 682 114 F. 22; 51 C.C.A. 648; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4051
  • D. M. Sechler Carriage Co. v. Deere & Mansur Co. Jan 21, 1902 No. 816 113 F. 285; 51 C.C.A. 242; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3959
  • In re Welling Jan 21, 1902 No. 809 113 F. 189; 51 C.C.A. 151; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3942
  • Peck Bros. & Co. v. Peck Bros. Jan 21, 1902 No. 818 113 F. 291; 62 L.R.A. 81; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3962
  • Searle & Hereth Co. v. Warner Jan 21, 1902 No. 766 112 F. 674; 50 C.C.A. 321; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3890
  • United States v. Shea Jan 21, 1902 No. 811 114 F. 38; 51 C.C.A. 664; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4053
  • Wenger v. Chicago & E. R. Jan 21, 1902 No. 753 114 F. 34; 51 C.C.A. 660; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4052
  • Brown v. First Nat. Bank of Newton Jan 7, 1902 No. 794 112 F. 901; 56 L.R.A. 876; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3908
  • De Gignac v. United States Jan 7, 1902 No. 801 113 F. 197; 52 C.C.A. 71; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3943
  • Harding v. Hart Jan 7, 1902 No. 438 113 F. 304; 51 C.C.A. 264; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3964
  • Illinois Car & Equipment Co. v. Linstroth Wagon Co. Jan 7, 1902 No. 778 112 F. 737; 50 C.C.A. 504; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3895
  • In re Union Feather & Wool Mfg. Co. Jan 7, 1902 No. 802 112 F. 774; 50 C.C.A. 524; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3897
  • Leonard v. American Cent. Ins. Co. of St. Louis Jan 7, 1902 No. 792 112 F. 1021; 50 C.C.A. 683; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920
  • McCrea v. Parsons Jan 7, 1902 No. 780 112 F. 917; 50 C.C.A. 612; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3910
  • Mobile & O. R. v. Coerver Jan 7, 1902 No. 752 112 F. 489; 50 C.C.A. 360; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3881
  • National Bank of the Republic v. Old Town Bank of Baltimore Jan 7, 1902 No. 786 112 F. 726; 50 C.C.A. 443; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3894
  • New York Dry Goods Store v. Pabst Brewing Co. Jan 7, 1902 No. 796 112 F. 381; 50 C.C.A. 295; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3880
  • Niles Tool Works Co. v. Louisville, N. A. & C. Ry. Co. Jan 7, 1902 No. 772 112 F. 561; 50 C.C.A. 390; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3884
  • Union Pressed Brick Co. v. Fultonham Brick & Drain Tile Co. Jan 7, 1902 No. 787 112 F. 920; 50 C.C.A. 615; 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 3911
« Prev 1 2 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑