U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 1912

Rosenstein v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided January 2, 1912 · Baker, Sanborn, Seaman

193 F. 1022; 113 C.C.A. 668; 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1122

Counsel

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois., George L. Schwein, for plaintiff in error., James H. Wilkerson, Harry A. Parkin, and Edwin W. Sims, •' ü. S. Atty., for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

American Insurance Union v. Buckley (Ohio Ct. App. 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We find in the record no error of such substance as to require or justify an order for a new trial. Counsel for plaintiff in error,, however, have called our attention to the matter of a proposed showing that the punishment should be less in view of extenuating circumstances which plaintiff in error excusably failed to bring before the District Court. As we have no jurisdiction to adjust the sentence, and as it seems proper that the matter should be inquired into, the judgment is vacated and the cause remanded for a resentence.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.