U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 1919

Pittsburgh, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided January 7, 1919 · Alschuler

257 F. 265; 168 C.C.A. 349; 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 2191

Counsel

Timothy J. Scofield, of Chicago, III., for plaintiff in error., Charles F. Clyne, of Chicago, 111., and J. Carter Fort, for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Schoonover v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (Minn. 1932)
Wood v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. (7th Cir. 1930)
Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Owen (4th Cir. 1929)
Kelly v. New England Mut. Life Ins. (District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania 1929)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.

This cause was tried in the District Court with No. 2507, Pennsylvania Co. v. United States, 257 Fed. 261, — C. C. A —, and the causes were hero argued together. Barring the fact that the shipments and switching charges which were the subject-matter of the controversy in the respective causes were different, the controlling facts and principles are identical. What we said in our opinion filed concurrently herewith in the Pennsylvania Case is alike applicable here.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.