U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 1922

Antolish v. Paul

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided May 18, 1922

283 F. 957; 1922 U.S. App. LEXIS 2309

Counsel

A. W. Richter, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellant., David A. Sondel, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision.

MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co. (Cal. 1959)
Barsky v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1948)
Murdoch v. Clark (1st Cir. 1931)
United States v. Nowak (District Court, E.D. Michigan 1955)
Milasinovich v. Serbian Progressive Club, Inc. (Pa. 1951)
Communist Party of United States of America v. Peek (Cal. 1942)
Pawell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Pa. Super. Ct. 1941)
State Ex Rel. Huff v. Reeves (Wash. 1940)
Strecker v. Kessler (5th Cir. 1938)
United States Ex Rel. Fortmueller v. Commissioner of Immigration (District Court, S.D. New York 1936)
Kjar v. Doak (7th Cir. 1932)
Fierstein v. Conaty (9th Cir. 1930)
Ex Parte Jurgans (D. Minn. 1927)
Pestereff v. Reed (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1927)
Jew Bok v. Nagle (9th Cir. 1925)
United States Ex Rel. Lisafeld v. Smith (District Court, W.D. New York 1924)
Ungar v. Seaman (8th Cir. 1924)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On the opinion of Judge Geiger in this case, which was filed on August 16, 1921, and the opinion of the Circuit Court of *960Appeals for the First Circuit, rendered on January 11, 1922, and reported in Skeffington v. Katzeff et al., 277 Fed. 129, dealing with the same issues of law and fact, the decision is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.