Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie, 41 F.2d 57 (7th Cir. 1930)
1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.

Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland *58Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must he granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Reference

Full Case Name
SENTINEL CO. v. DINWIDDIE
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published