U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, 1930

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · Decided May 28, 1930
41 F.2d 57; 1930 U.S. App. LEXIS 2726 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Sentinel Co. v. Dinwiddie

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

Appellee brought this action to recover damages occasioned by appellant’s publicaH°n an alleged libel. The verdict of the 3my m appellee’s favor was, on his motion, ^ aside as inadequate and a new trial granted. This appeal is from the order granting the new trial.

Appellee moves this court to dismiss the appeal because the order is not an appealable one. Upon the authority of Dry Dock E. B. & B. R. Co. v. Petkunas (C. C. A.) 261 F. 988; Wright v. Taft-Peirce Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.) 287 F. 131; and Fort Dodge Portland *58Cement Corp. v. Monk (C. C. A.) 276 F. 113, the motion must he granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.