William E. Harris v. The American Legion and Arthur Wayne Murphy
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Parker Drilling Co. v. Metlakatla Indian Community (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1978)
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. National Surety Corp. (District Court, S.D. Iowa 1972)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
The amended complaint herein is in two paragraphs. The first is in two counts in each of which libel is charged. The second paragraph is in one count predicated upon alleged slander.
The cause was tried before the Court on the separate issue of jurisdiction under § 1332(a) (1), Title 28 U.S.C.A. The pleadings and record presented no jurisdictional question other than the issue of diversity of citizenship.
The District Court held that it was without jurisdiction under § 1332(a) (1), and the action must be dismissed as to the American Legion by reason of the fact that while the Legion is a citizen of the United States, it is not a citizen of any state for jurisdictional purposes. The complaint also was dismissed as to defendant Murphy for the reasons stated in the Court's opinion.
We think the District Court’s opinion adequately and completely discussed the issue and that the Court reached the correct conclusions of law. The citation of the trial court’s opinion is Harris v. American Legion, D.C., 162 F.Supp. 700. We adopt said opinion as the opinion of this Court.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.